<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 932 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357229</link>
    <description>Failure to communicate reasons for rejecting a borrower&#039;s representation under the security-enforcement framework is mandatory, but may not invalidate enforcement where repayment proposals were substantially considered and repeated repayment opportunities were given. Agricultural-land exclusion depends on the property&#039;s actual character and use, rather than revenue entries; land forming part of a commercial hotel asset is not excluded merely because of incidental cultivation or a pending conversion application. Symbolic possession does not prevent a secured creditor from seeking physical possession after sale. Fraud or collusion in a public auction requires a reliable factual foundation; purchaser awareness of disputes is insufficient. The enforcement measures and auction sale remained valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 932 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357229</link>
      <description>Failure to communicate reasons for rejecting a borrower&#039;s representation under the security-enforcement framework is mandatory, but may not invalidate enforcement where repayment proposals were substantially considered and repeated repayment opportunities were given. Agricultural-land exclusion depends on the property&#039;s actual character and use, rather than revenue entries; land forming part of a commercial hotel asset is not excluded merely because of incidental cultivation or a pending conversion application. Symbolic possession does not prevent a secured creditor from seeking physical possession after sale. Fraud or collusion in a public auction requires a reliable factual foundation; purchaser awareness of disputes is insufficient. The enforcement measures and auction sale remained valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>