https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357228 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the petitioners were not entitled to relief as they did not meet the mandatory payment deadlines under the VCES, 2013. The court held that the scheme does not allow for discretionary extension of time for payment and rejected the petitioners' plea for condonation of delay. The impugned communication declaring their ineligibility under the VCES, 2013, was upheld. en-us Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Dec 2018 14:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357228 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the petitioners were not entitled to relief as they did not meet the mandatory payment deadlines under the VCES, 2013. The court held that the scheme does not allow for discretionary extension of time for payment and rejected the petitioners' plea for condonation of delay. The impugned communication declaring their ineligibility under the VCES, 2013, was upheld. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357228