<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 929 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357226</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, holding that they were not liable to pay service tax on transportation charges for imported goods as they had not paid the freight charges. The Tribunal found that Rule 2(1)(d)(v) of the Service Tax Rules did not apply in this case, as the appellants were not the ones who had paid the transportation charges. Consequently, the demand for service tax, interest, and penalty was set aside, and the appellants were entitled to consequential relief as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 12:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 929 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357226</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, holding that they were not liable to pay service tax on transportation charges for imported goods as they had not paid the freight charges. The Tribunal found that Rule 2(1)(d)(v) of the Service Tax Rules did not apply in this case, as the appellants were not the ones who had paid the transportation charges. Consequently, the demand for service tax, interest, and penalty was set aside, and the appellants were entitled to consequential relief as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>