https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357224 The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant. It held that transportation activities related to coal/mineral were correctly classified under "Cargo Handling Service" and "Goods Transport by Road" for taxation purposes, not under "Mining of Mineral, Oil or Gas Services." The appellant was granted consequential benefits following the clarification provided by the Central Board of Excise & Customs, resulting in the unsustainable demand being overturned. en-us Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357224 The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant. It held that transportation activities related to coal/mineral were correctly classified under "Cargo Handling Service" and "Goods Transport by Road" for taxation purposes, not under "Mining of Mineral, Oil or Gas Services." The appellant was granted consequential benefits following the clarification provided by the Central Board of Excise & Customs, resulting in the unsustainable demand being overturned. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357224