https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357218 The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal regarding the case involving the manufacture and clearance of branded footwear, imposition of duty, interest, and penalty. The appellant's retraction of statements was deemed lacking credibility, with documentary evidence supporting the Revenue's allegations. The presence of incriminating slips and admissions by involved parties led to the dismissal of the appeal, affirming duty recovery and penalty imposition. The judgment was delivered by Mr. Anil Choudhary, Member (Judicial) of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, ALLAHABAD on 13/02/2018. en-us Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:44:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357218 The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal regarding the case involving the manufacture and clearance of branded footwear, imposition of duty, interest, and penalty. The appellant's retraction of statements was deemed lacking credibility, with documentary evidence supporting the Revenue's allegations. The presence of incriminating slips and admissions by involved parties led to the dismissal of the appeal, affirming duty recovery and penalty imposition. The judgment was delivered by Mr. Anil Choudhary, Member (Judicial) of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, ALLAHABAD on 13/02/2018. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357218