https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357213 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging the classification of goods produced by the respondents as Organic Composite Solvents under Tariff Item No.38140010. The Commissioner's decision was upheld based on a chemical examiner's report and the 8-digit Tariff system, determining that the goods should not be classified as Motor Spirit under Tariff Item No.27101111. The Tribunal found the Revenue's arguments repetitive and lacking merit, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and granting consequential relief to the respondent as per the law. en-us Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Dec 2018 11:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357213 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging the classification of goods produced by the respondents as Organic Composite Solvents under Tariff Item No.38140010. The Commissioner's decision was upheld based on a chemical examiner's report and the 8-digit Tariff system, determining that the goods should not be classified as Motor Spirit under Tariff Item No.27101111. The Tribunal found the Revenue's arguments repetitive and lacking merit, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and granting consequential relief to the respondent as per the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357213