<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 915 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357212</link>
    <description>Goods arising during the manufacture of refined oil were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 89/95-CE because a Larger Bench had already held that such products are not excisable goods. The Tribunal followed that binding view and accepted that the exemption for waste arising in the course of manufacture of exempted goods applies to these goods. The controversy was therefore no longer open, and the respondents were entitled to the benefit of the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:44:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 915 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357212</link>
      <description>Goods arising during the manufacture of refined oil were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 89/95-CE because a Larger Bench had already held that such products are not excisable goods. The Tribunal followed that binding view and accepted that the exemption for waste arising in the course of manufacture of exempted goods applies to these goods. The controversy was therefore no longer open, and the respondents were entitled to the benefit of the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>