<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 911 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357208</link>
    <description>Revenue appeals against deletion of demand and penalty were found covered by the CBEC litigation policy, as communicated by letter dated 17.08.2011 and as amended. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the appeals as falling within the policy coverage and dismissed them, with consequential relief to the respondents as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:44:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 911 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357208</link>
      <description>Revenue appeals against deletion of demand and penalty were found covered by the CBEC litigation policy, as communicated by letter dated 17.08.2011 and as amended. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the appeals as falling within the policy coverage and dismissed them, with consequential relief to the respondents as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>