<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 910 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357207</link>
    <description>Receipt of the declaration required under Notification No. 50/2003-CE was treated as established on the basis of the departmental communication acknowledging receipt on 20.10.2009. As that finding was not specifically disputed, the objection that postal acknowledgement had not been produced or accepted did not survive. On that basis, the declaration was regarded as having been received by the department, and denial of the notification benefit was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:44:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 910 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357207</link>
      <description>Receipt of the declaration required under Notification No. 50/2003-CE was treated as established on the basis of the departmental communication acknowledging receipt on 20.10.2009. As that finding was not specifically disputed, the objection that postal acknowledgement had not been produced or accepted did not survive. On that basis, the declaration was regarded as having been received by the department, and denial of the notification benefit was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>