<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1195 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200087</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant regarding the admissibility of Cenvat Credit and imposition of penalty. Relying on the Supreme Court ruling, the Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed by the Original Authority and upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals) as the appellant had debited the disputed entries along with interest, nullifying the credit taken.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 07:51:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1195 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200087</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant regarding the admissibility of Cenvat Credit and imposition of penalty. Relying on the Supreme Court ruling, the Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed by the Original Authority and upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals) as the appellant had debited the disputed entries along with interest, nullifying the credit taken.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>