<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 11 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12352</link>
    <description>For wealth-tax valuation of remaindermen&#039;s interest in trust property, probable estate duty payable on the life tenant&#039;s death was treated as a permissible deduction because market value under section 7 must reflect what a willing buyer would pay for the property actually available on the valuation date. The rate of interest taken from the Wealth-tax Rules for valuing life interest was upheld for jewellery forming the corpus, as no contrary material displaced that basis. Deduction under section 5(1)(xxvi) was also allowed for bank deposits on the footing that the beneficiary, as the person beneficially entitled, was the relevant owner for wealth-tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 11 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12352</link>
      <description>For wealth-tax valuation of remaindermen&#039;s interest in trust property, probable estate duty payable on the life tenant&#039;s death was treated as a permissible deduction because market value under section 7 must reflect what a willing buyer would pay for the property actually available on the valuation date. The rate of interest taken from the Wealth-tax Rules for valuing life interest was upheld for jewellery forming the corpus, as no contrary material displaced that basis. Deduction under section 5(1)(xxvi) was also allowed for bank deposits on the footing that the beneficiary, as the person beneficially entitled, was the relevant owner for wealth-tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>