<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 83 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12344</link>
    <description>Dumpers owned by the assessee and used in mining operations under contract with the mine owner were treated as being used for mining purposes, not as road transport vehicles merely carrying goods on roads. Applying the ordinary-use test for the vehicle, the court held that such deployment fell within the relevant allowance provision. Investment allowance was therefore allowable on the dumpers, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 83 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12344</link>
      <description>Dumpers owned by the assessee and used in mining operations under contract with the mine owner were treated as being used for mining purposes, not as road transport vehicles merely carrying goods on roads. Applying the ordinary-use test for the vehicle, the court held that such deployment fell within the relevant allowance provision. Investment allowance was therefore allowable on the dumpers, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>