<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 81 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12339</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings in favor of the assessee. It ruled that the interest paid to the partners on their individual accounts was not includible in the firm&#039;s hands under section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the Court found sufficient material to support that the partners had individual businesses and undisclosed sources of income, separate from the firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 81 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12339</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings in favor of the assessee. It ruled that the interest paid to the partners on their individual accounts was not includible in the firm&#039;s hands under section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the Court found sufficient material to support that the partners had individual businesses and undisclosed sources of income, separate from the firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>