<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (2) TMI 18 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200059</link>
    <description>Court-held auction sales effect immediate transmission of title independent of private transfer formalities, and Article 25/Section 34(3) do not bar mutation of shares acquired by court sale; omission to serve the notice required by Order 21, Rule 22 C.P. Code renders the sale void only as to the unrepresented judgment-debtor&#039;s share, not the entire sale, subject to factual determination whether the judgment-debtor died before execution; the limitation under Article 120 began when the company&#039;s definitive refusal to register was communicated, and plaintiffs&#039; entitlement to dividends and quantification of share (either full or proportionate) is remanded for determination and account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:34:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (2) TMI 18 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200059</link>
      <description>Court-held auction sales effect immediate transmission of title independent of private transfer formalities, and Article 25/Section 34(3) do not bar mutation of shares acquired by court sale; omission to serve the notice required by Order 21, Rule 22 C.P. Code renders the sale void only as to the unrepresented judgment-debtor&#039;s share, not the entire sale, subject to factual determination whether the judgment-debtor died before execution; the limitation under Article 120 began when the company&#039;s definitive refusal to register was communicated, and plaintiffs&#039; entitlement to dividends and quantification of share (either full or proportionate) is remanded for determination and account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>