<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1659 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200055</link>
    <description>In section 9 proceedings, executed loan and guarantee documents were treated as usable for interim relief where the stamping objection was factually unsustainable because duty had been paid at the place of execution. Territorial jurisdiction was found from the contractual place of repayment in Mumbai, along with uncontroverted averments that sanction, disbursal and execution of related instruments occurred there. On the interim-protection issue, the respondents&#039; default, non-response and the uncertain whereabouts of the hypothecated equipment justified appointment of a Court Receiver and ad-interim injunction to preserve the secured assets pending arbitration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:07:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1659 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200055</link>
      <description>In section 9 proceedings, executed loan and guarantee documents were treated as usable for interim relief where the stamping objection was factually unsustainable because duty had been paid at the place of execution. Territorial jurisdiction was found from the contractual place of repayment in Mumbai, along with uncontroverted averments that sanction, disbursal and execution of related instruments occurred there. On the interim-protection issue, the respondents&#039; default, non-response and the uncertain whereabouts of the hypothecated equipment justified appointment of a Court Receiver and ad-interim injunction to preserve the secured assets pending arbitration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>