<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 73 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12323</link>
    <description>For computing capital under rule 2 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, the cost of shares is to be excluded where the shares fall within the category of assets whose income is of the kind excluded under rule 1 of the First Schedule. Actual receipt of dividend or other excluded income during the accounting period is not a for exclusion; the statutory inquiry is whether the asset is capable of yielding the relevant excluded income. Applying a literal construction of the computation provisions, the court held that the cost of the shares was rightly excluded from the assessee&#039;s capital and answered the issue in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 73 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12323</link>
      <description>For computing capital under rule 2 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, the cost of shares is to be excluded where the shares fall within the category of assets whose income is of the kind excluded under rule 1 of the First Schedule. Actual receipt of dividend or other excluded income during the accounting period is not a for exclusion; the statutory inquiry is whether the asset is capable of yielding the relevant excluded income. Applying a literal construction of the computation provisions, the court held that the cost of the shares was rightly excluded from the assessee&#039;s capital and answered the issue in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>