<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 897 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357194</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking the recalling/rectification of an order dated 23.11.2017, finding the petitioner&#039;s claims of clerical mistakes and inability to file written arguments unfounded. The court noted the petitioner&#039;s attempt to essentially seek a re-hearing under the guise of recalling/rectification and deemed the application lacking merit. However, the petitioner was granted liberty to pursue further legal remedies as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 07:27:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 897 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357194</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking the recalling/rectification of an order dated 23.11.2017, finding the petitioner&#039;s claims of clerical mistakes and inability to file written arguments unfounded. The court noted the petitioner&#039;s attempt to essentially seek a re-hearing under the guise of recalling/rectification and deemed the application lacking merit. However, the petitioner was granted liberty to pursue further legal remedies as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>