<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 896 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357193</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the addition of Rs. 20 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) towards &#039;unexplained cash deposits&#039;. The Tribunal found that the rushed assessment without proper opportunity for verification was unfair. Emphasizing the need for adherence to legal procedures, the Tribunal directed the A.O. to delete the addition, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2018 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 896 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357193</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the addition of Rs. 20 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) towards &#039;unexplained cash deposits&#039;. The Tribunal found that the rushed assessment without proper opportunity for verification was unfair. Emphasizing the need for adherence to legal procedures, the Tribunal directed the A.O. to delete the addition, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>