<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 883 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357180</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed by the AO. The decision was based on procedural flaws in the penalty notice and the absence of specific allegations and satisfaction regarding concealment or inaccurate particulars. The tribunal emphasized the necessity for clear and specific findings in penalty proceedings, in line with various judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 883 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357180</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed by the AO. The decision was based on procedural flaws in the penalty notice and the absence of specific allegations and satisfaction regarding concealment or inaccurate particulars. The tribunal emphasized the necessity for clear and specific findings in penalty proceedings, in line with various judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>