<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 877 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357174</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for NCCD cess and duty on demurrage charges but ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the calculation of customs duty on imported crude oil. It held that the duty should be based on the actual quantity received in shore tanks, not the Bill of Lading quantity. The judgment clarified the method of calculating customs duty, emphasizing the significance of considering the actual quantity received.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 877 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357174</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for NCCD cess and duty on demurrage charges but ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the calculation of customs duty on imported crude oil. It held that the duty should be based on the actual quantity received in shore tanks, not the Bill of Lading quantity. The judgment clarified the method of calculating customs duty, emphasizing the significance of considering the actual quantity received.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>