<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 871 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357168</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal emphasized the importance of public orders being passed publicly and not conveyed by subordinates behind the back of the appellant. It directed the Commissioner to pass a public order hearing the appellant publicly. The judgment stressed judicial discipline, stating that the authority hearing a matter should pass the order directly. The Tribunal disposed of the early hearing application and appeal, acknowledging the appellant&#039;s genuine hardship. It highlighted the necessity of providing reasons and a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellant, ensuring due process. Instructions were given to serve the order copy on relevant parties and communicate with the Chief Commissioner for issuing guidelines to prevent future procedural issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 871 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357168</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal emphasized the importance of public orders being passed publicly and not conveyed by subordinates behind the back of the appellant. It directed the Commissioner to pass a public order hearing the appellant publicly. The judgment stressed judicial discipline, stating that the authority hearing a matter should pass the order directly. The Tribunal disposed of the early hearing application and appeal, acknowledging the appellant&#039;s genuine hardship. It highlighted the necessity of providing reasons and a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellant, ensuring due process. Instructions were given to serve the order copy on relevant parties and communicate with the Chief Commissioner for issuing guidelines to prevent future procedural issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>