<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 867 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357164</link>
    <description>The amended Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 confers on a daughter of a Mitakshara coparcener the status of coparcener in her own right, with the same rights and liabilities as a son, and applies to living daughters of living coparceners on the commencement date regardless of birth before 2005. The earlier rule of survivorship and the fiction of notional partition under the unamended provision do not defeat this statutory change. In pending partition proceedings, rights are finally worked out only at the final decree stage, so a preliminary decree does not prevent application of the amended law. Daughters were therefore entitled to coparcenary rights and a share in joint family property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 867 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357164</link>
      <description>The amended Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 confers on a daughter of a Mitakshara coparcener the status of coparcener in her own right, with the same rights and liabilities as a son, and applies to living daughters of living coparceners on the commencement date regardless of birth before 2005. The earlier rule of survivorship and the fiction of notional partition under the unamended provision do not defeat this statutory change. In pending partition proceedings, rights are finally worked out only at the final decree stage, so a preliminary decree does not prevent application of the amended law. Daughters were therefore entitled to coparcenary rights and a share in joint family property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>