https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357158 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal regarding service tax liability on commission paid to overseas agents. It found no merit in the Revenue's arguments, citing precedents and holding that the impugned order did not require interference. The Tribunal also supported the application of the reverse charge mechanism and the availment of CENVAT credit for service tax paid, emphasizing revenue neutrality post 18.04.2006. Based on these considerations, the appeal was rejected, and the impugned order was deemed correct and legally sound. en-us Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Mar 2018 07:25:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357158 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal regarding service tax liability on commission paid to overseas agents. It found no merit in the Revenue's arguments, citing precedents and holding that the impugned order did not require interference. The Tribunal also supported the application of the reverse charge mechanism and the availment of CENVAT credit for service tax paid, emphasizing revenue neutrality post 18.04.2006. Based on these considerations, the appeal was rejected, and the impugned order was deemed correct and legally sound. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357158