<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 860 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357157</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner&#039;s order setting aside the demand for service tax and penalty imposition. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was deemed inadequate as it only addressed the demand related to electricity and water charges, failing to consider other charges collected by the respondent. The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for a fresh decision, instructing a comprehensive review of all expense categories identified in the show-cause notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 07:25:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 860 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357157</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner&#039;s order setting aside the demand for service tax and penalty imposition. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was deemed inadequate as it only addressed the demand related to electricity and water charges, failing to consider other charges collected by the respondent. The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for a fresh decision, instructing a comprehensive review of all expense categories identified in the show-cause notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>