https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357150 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chandigarh, in a case regarding liability for service tax on renting of immovable property service, held that an Agriculture Produce Market Committee, not being the property owner but collecting rent for the Board, was not liable for service tax. The Tribunal found that imposing service tax on the appellant would result in double taxation since the Board was already paying service tax on the collected rent. Consequently, the demands for service tax were set aside, and the appeals were allowed. en-us Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357150 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chandigarh, in a case regarding liability for service tax on renting of immovable property service, held that an Agriculture Produce Market Committee, not being the property owner but collecting rent for the Board, was not liable for service tax. The Tribunal found that imposing service tax on the appellant would result in double taxation since the Board was already paying service tax on the collected rent. Consequently, the demands for service tax were set aside, and the appeals were allowed. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357150