https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357147 The High Court found that the Trial Court erred in imposing a sentence lower than the mandatory minimum under Section 9(1)(d)(i) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, without recording special and adequate reasons. The Court allowed the criminal revision petition, remanding the case to the Trial Court for a fresh determination of the sentence within two months, considering any mitigating circumstances presented. en-us Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jun 2018 16:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357147 The High Court found that the Trial Court erred in imposing a sentence lower than the mandatory minimum under Section 9(1)(d)(i) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, without recording special and adequate reasons. The Court allowed the criminal revision petition, remanding the case to the Trial Court for a fresh determination of the sentence within two months, considering any mitigating circumstances presented. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357147