https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357133 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's claims for benefits under notification No. 64/95-C and notification No. 25/2002-CE for goods supplied to the Indian Navy. The penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, was not imposed due to the appellant's misunderstanding, and penalties under section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, were dropped. The demand for duty liability beyond the limitation period was set aside, and the Tribunal directed a recalculation within the limitation period. Ultimately, the Tribunal disposed of the appeal based on these findings. en-us Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Mar 2018 07:24:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357133 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's claims for benefits under notification No. 64/95-C and notification No. 25/2002-CE for goods supplied to the Indian Navy. The penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, was not imposed due to the appellant's misunderstanding, and penalties under section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, were dropped. The demand for duty liability beyond the limitation period was set aside, and the Tribunal directed a recalculation within the limitation period. Ultimately, the Tribunal disposed of the appeal based on these findings. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357133