<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 834 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357131</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter back for fresh consideration, emphasizing adherence to the principles of natural justice. The adjudicating authority was directed to reevaluate the issue in light of the communication from Revenue officers, without expressing any opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 07:24:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 834 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357131</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter back for fresh consideration, emphasizing adherence to the principles of natural justice. The adjudicating authority was directed to reevaluate the issue in light of the communication from Revenue officers, without expressing any opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>