<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 10 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12316</link>
    <description>A provision for liability under the Employees Provident Fund Act was deductible in the assessment year 1980-81 because the liability had accrued during the relevant previous year. Applying the principle in Kedarnath Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. CIT, the later ascertainment of the exact liability did not prevent deduction once the obligation had crystallised. The deduction was therefore allowable for that year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 10 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12316</link>
      <description>A provision for liability under the Employees Provident Fund Act was deductible in the assessment year 1980-81 because the liability had accrued during the relevant previous year. Applying the principle in Kedarnath Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. CIT, the later ascertainment of the exact liability did not prevent deduction once the obligation had crystallised. The deduction was therefore allowable for that year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>