<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 831 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357128</link>
    <description>Brass sheets and circles used in making utensils and handicrafts were treated as brass goods under Heading 7409 attracting nil Central Excise duty. On that basis, captive-consumption relief under Notification No. 67/1995 did not arise because the final use itself was nil-rated. The CESTAT noted the controlling Supreme Court ruling and held that the goods were not exigible to duty, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the exemption claim failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 07:24:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 831 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357128</link>
      <description>Brass sheets and circles used in making utensils and handicrafts were treated as brass goods under Heading 7409 attracting nil Central Excise duty. On that basis, captive-consumption relief under Notification No. 67/1995 did not arise because the final use itself was nil-rated. The CESTAT noted the controlling Supreme Court ruling and held that the goods were not exigible to duty, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the exemption claim failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>