<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 824 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357121</link>
    <description>Revenue&#039;s challenge to the Commissioner (Appeals) order failed because it rested on a classification and Cenvat credit dispute that had already been decided in earlier Tribunal proceedings and had reached finality after the High Court reference was dismissed. The Tribunal treated the underlying controversy under Rule 173-B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 as no longer open for reconsideration, leaving no surviving basis to interfere with the order under appeal. The appeal was therefore dismissed as lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 824 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357121</link>
      <description>Revenue&#039;s challenge to the Commissioner (Appeals) order failed because it rested on a classification and Cenvat credit dispute that had already been decided in earlier Tribunal proceedings and had reached finality after the High Court reference was dismissed. The Tribunal treated the underlying controversy under Rule 173-B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 as no longer open for reconsideration, leaving no surviving basis to interfere with the order under appeal. The appeal was therefore dismissed as lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>