https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357118 The Tribunal held that the rebate claim adjustment against outstanding dues was not permissible. The demand related to an order stayed by the Commissioner was set aside and deemed non-sustainable, warranting a refund to the appellant. As for orders with pending appeals and pre-deposits made by the appellant, the Tribunal ruled that these amounts were in dispute and could not be adjusted until the appeals were resolved. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeals with any consequential relief. en-us Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357118 The Tribunal held that the rebate claim adjustment against outstanding dues was not permissible. The demand related to an order stayed by the Commissioner was set aside and deemed non-sustainable, warranting a refund to the appellant. As for orders with pending appeals and pre-deposits made by the appellant, the Tribunal ruled that these amounts were in dispute and could not be adjusted until the appeals were resolved. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeals with any consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357118