<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 820 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357117</link>
    <description>Ambulances supplied with the prescribed fitments, furniture and accessories were held to satisfy the exemption entry because the notification required only those specified fittings and did not require installation of medical equipment. The vehicles had been configured to remain usable only as ambulances and were supplied to the Government of Maharashtra, leaving no real scope for misuse. On that basis, denial of exemption and the consequential penalty were found unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 820 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357117</link>
      <description>Ambulances supplied with the prescribed fitments, furniture and accessories were held to satisfy the exemption entry because the notification required only those specified fittings and did not require installation of medical equipment. The vehicles had been configured to remain usable only as ambulances and were supplied to the Government of Maharashtra, leaving no real scope for misuse. On that basis, denial of exemption and the consequential penalty were found unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>