<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1354 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200034</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition challenging orders under the Central Sales Tax Act for the assessment year 2011-12, directing the respondent to accept Form I and issue fresh orders for sales to &quot;SEZ.&quot; The court emphasized the authority&#039;s power to extend time for submitting declaration forms and highlighted the circular allowing reopening for new C forms. Referring to a Full Bench judgment, the court held the respondent&#039;s refusal to revise the order as untenable, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements. The impugned orders were set aside, and the petitioner prevailed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 20:42:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1354 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200034</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition challenging orders under the Central Sales Tax Act for the assessment year 2011-12, directing the respondent to accept Form I and issue fresh orders for sales to &quot;SEZ.&quot; The court emphasized the authority&#039;s power to extend time for submitting declaration forms and highlighted the circular allowing reopening for new C forms. Referring to a Full Bench judgment, the court held the respondent&#039;s refusal to revise the order as untenable, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements. The impugned orders were set aside, and the petitioner prevailed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>