<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2709 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200037</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision to consider net interest for computing disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the need to establish a direct nexus between investments in securities and exempt income. The Tribunal dismissed the Assessing Officer&#039;s appeal, affirming the correct application of Rule 8D for disallowance calculation and the importance of apportioning interest expenditure accurately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2709 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200037</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision to consider net interest for computing disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the need to establish a direct nexus between investments in securities and exempt income. The Tribunal dismissed the Assessing Officer&#039;s appeal, affirming the correct application of Rule 8D for disallowance calculation and the importance of apportioning interest expenditure accurately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>