<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1337 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200041</link>
    <description>The transition from exemption under the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 to the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 replaced the earlier regime with a limited deferment option under Section 96(3)(b), to be exercised through the prescribed Form A-XII procedure under Rule 57. If deferment was not duly opted for, delayed tax or deferred tax attracted statutory interest. The article further notes that a refund of such interest is unavailable unless the claimant shows the burden was not passed on, because otherwise restitution would amount to unjust enrichment. On those principles, waiver or refund of the interest claim was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 20:42:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1337 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200041</link>
      <description>The transition from exemption under the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 to the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 replaced the earlier regime with a limited deferment option under Section 96(3)(b), to be exercised through the prescribed Form A-XII procedure under Rule 57. If deferment was not duly opted for, delayed tax or deferred tax attracted statutory interest. The article further notes that a refund of such interest is unavailable unless the claimant shows the burden was not passed on, because otherwise restitution would amount to unjust enrichment. On those principles, waiver or refund of the interest claim was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>