<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1425 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200045</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the classification of brass wires. The Court held that the brass wires should indeed be classified under entry No.27 of Schedule IIA, emphasizing the inclusive nature of the entry. The Court found that the Tribunal misinterpreted the meaning of &quot;wire&quot; and failed to apply relevant legal precedents, ultimately quashing the impugned orders and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 20:42:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1425 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200045</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the classification of brass wires. The Court held that the brass wires should indeed be classified under entry No.27 of Schedule IIA, emphasizing the inclusive nature of the entry. The Court found that the Tribunal misinterpreted the meaning of &quot;wire&quot; and failed to apply relevant legal precedents, ultimately quashing the impugned orders and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>