<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1426 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200046</link>
    <description>The notification dated 4 September 1995 under Section 8(5) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 was construed as granting exemption to the goods manufactured by an eligible industrial unit, not merely to the manufacturer-dealer or only the first inter-State sale. The proviso was treated as a qualification to the exemption rather than a restriction defeating the main benefit, and Rule 28A(4)(c) was read consistently with that interpretation by recognising exemption at subsequent stages of sale. The exemption was therefore held to attach to the goods, and the issue was resolved in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 20:42:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1426 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200046</link>
      <description>The notification dated 4 September 1995 under Section 8(5) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 was construed as granting exemption to the goods manufactured by an eligible industrial unit, not merely to the manufacturer-dealer or only the first inter-State sale. The proviso was treated as a qualification to the exemption rather than a restriction defeating the main benefit, and Rule 28A(4)(c) was read consistently with that interpretation by recognising exemption at subsequent stages of sale. The exemption was therefore held to attach to the goods, and the issue was resolved in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>