https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200032 The Bombay High Court held that the services provided by the Appellants did not qualify as Franchisee Services under Section 65(105)(zze) of the Finance Act as the obligation not to engage in providing similar services for any other person was not fulfilled. en-us Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Mar 2018 18:51:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200032 The Bombay High Court held that the services provided by the Appellants did not qualify as Franchisee Services under Section 65(105)(zze) of the Finance Act as the obligation not to engage in providing similar services for any other person was not fulfilled. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200032