<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (8) TMI 83 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200029</link>
    <description>A landlord&#039;s claim for personal occupation under rent restriction law is established when the need is genuine and honest, not an absolute necessity, and must be assessed on a broad practical basis. Relevant circumstances may include family composition, social customs, growing children, the presence of married daughters and their children, and the need for greater comfort. The authorities below were found to have taken an unduly legalistic approach and to have ignored these surrounding facts. The High Court held the requirement bona fide, allowed the revision, set aside the appellate order, and restored the eviction order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 18:22:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (8) TMI 83 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200029</link>
      <description>A landlord&#039;s claim for personal occupation under rent restriction law is established when the need is genuine and honest, not an absolute necessity, and must be assessed on a broad practical basis. Relevant circumstances may include family composition, social customs, growing children, the presence of married daughters and their children, and the need for greater comfort. The authorities below were found to have taken an unduly legalistic approach and to have ignored these surrounding facts. The High Court held the requirement bona fide, allowed the revision, set aside the appellate order, and restored the eviction order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>