<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1233 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200025</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by modifying the addition of agricultural income and deleting the additions under Section 41(1). Disallowances for repairs and maintenance, telephone, and vehicle expenses were upheld. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was cancelled, as the Tribunal deemed it unjustified based on the nature of the additions and explanations provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 16:51:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1233 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200025</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by modifying the addition of agricultural income and deleting the additions under Section 41(1). Disallowances for repairs and maintenance, telephone, and vehicle expenses were upheld. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was cancelled, as the Tribunal deemed it unjustified based on the nature of the additions and explanations provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>