<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1541 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200021</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes and remanded the issue of the change in the method of accounting back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the other issues, confirming the deductions for interest on advances to subsidiaries and bad debts while allowing the capitalization of interest as part of the cost of acquisition of mutual funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 15:22:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1541 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200021</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes and remanded the issue of the change in the method of accounting back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the other issues, confirming the deductions for interest on advances to subsidiaries and bad debts while allowing the capitalization of interest as part of the cost of acquisition of mutual funds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>