<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (9) TMI 359 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200018</link>
    <description>Proper corporate authorisation is required to institute company litigation: where the Articles subject a managing director to Board control and no Board resolution authorises proceedings, the managing director cannot unilaterally sue or appoint an attorney. Meeting notices and resolutions are ineffective where the secretary lacks authority to issue notice, meetings are improperly convened, or service on entitled persons is unproved. Ex parte maritime arrest relief must be vacated where material facts concerning corporate control, internal disputes, or the underlying agreement are suppressed or misstated. The proceedings failed, and the vessel was released with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:52:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (9) TMI 359 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200018</link>
      <description>Proper corporate authorisation is required to institute company litigation: where the Articles subject a managing director to Board control and no Board resolution authorises proceedings, the managing director cannot unilaterally sue or appoint an attorney. Meeting notices and resolutions are ineffective where the secretary lacks authority to issue notice, meetings are improperly convened, or service on entitled persons is unproved. Ex parte maritime arrest relief must be vacated where material facts concerning corporate control, internal disputes, or the underlying agreement are suppressed or misstated. The proceedings failed, and the vessel was released with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>