<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (9) TMI 359 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200018</link>
    <description>Company litigation requires proper corporate authority: where the articles place the managing director under board control, institution of a suit and appointment of a constituted attorney need specific board authorisation, and proceedings commenced without a board resolution are unauthorised. Corporate notices and resolutions are ineffective where the issuing officer lacks power under the articles and valid service and convening are not proved. Ex parte maritime relief will also be set aside where material facts about company control, internal disputes, and the scope of the underlying agreement are suppressed or misstated, because incomplete disclosure vitiates interim orders and supports vacatur of arrest and ancillary relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:52:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (9) TMI 359 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200018</link>
      <description>Company litigation requires proper corporate authority: where the articles place the managing director under board control, institution of a suit and appointment of a constituted attorney need specific board authorisation, and proceedings commenced without a board resolution are unauthorised. Corporate notices and resolutions are ineffective where the issuing officer lacks power under the articles and valid service and convening are not proved. Ex parte maritime relief will also be set aside where material facts about company control, internal disputes, and the scope of the underlying agreement are suppressed or misstated, because incomplete disclosure vitiates interim orders and supports vacatur of arrest and ancillary relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>