https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200015 In a Hindu joint family dispute, surrounding circumstances such as lack of reliable proof of severance, forged or ante-dated relinquishment deeds, and absence of convincing evidence of separate funds supported the view that the property remained joint family property and that the trust arrangement was not a bona fide disposition. A belated objection under section 42 of the Specific Relief Act could not non-suit the plaintiff where it was not pleaded in the written statement or framed as an issue. On limitation, article 120 began to run only on a clear and unequivocal threat to the asserted right, and the suit was treated as timely. en-us Tue, 17 Nov 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:17:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200015 In a Hindu joint family dispute, surrounding circumstances such as lack of reliable proof of severance, forged or ante-dated relinquishment deeds, and absence of convincing evidence of separate funds supported the view that the property remained joint family property and that the trust arrangement was not a bona fide disposition. A belated objection under section 42 of the Specific Relief Act could not non-suit the plaintiff where it was not pleaded in the written statement or framed as an issue. On limitation, article 120 began to run only on a clear and unequivocal threat to the asserted right, and the suit was treated as timely. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Nov 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200015