<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (1) TMI 120 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200012</link>
    <description>Amendments to the Orissa Kendu Leaves trade-control regime and the related rules were upheld because they were designed to make the State monopoly operate effectively and were not shown to be arbitrary, discriminatory or mala fide. The possibility of additional agents or purchasers, including nominees or relations of purchasers, did not invalidate the scheme where agents remained bound to buy at fixed rates, collect, store, process and account to Government. The State was not required to accept the highest tender in every case, and the record showed commercial factors rather than fraudulent preference. The challenges therefore failed and the impugned measures survived scrutiny.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 10:58:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (1) TMI 120 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200012</link>
      <description>Amendments to the Orissa Kendu Leaves trade-control regime and the related rules were upheld because they were designed to make the State monopoly operate effectively and were not shown to be arbitrary, discriminatory or mala fide. The possibility of additional agents or purchasers, including nominees or relations of purchasers, did not invalidate the scheme where agents remained bound to buy at fixed rates, collect, store, process and account to Government. The State was not required to accept the highest tender in every case, and the record showed commercial factors rather than fraudulent preference. The challenges therefore failed and the impugned measures survived scrutiny.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>