<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 812 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357109</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, ruling that the Amendment Act applies prospectively to arbitral and court proceedings initiated post its enforcement. The amended Section 36 applies to pending Section 34 applications due to its procedural nature. Emphasizing the legislative intent to expedite arbitration and minimize court intervention, the court upheld the prospective application of the Amendment Act to ongoing proceedings&#039; procedural aspects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 812 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357109</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, ruling that the Amendment Act applies prospectively to arbitral and court proceedings initiated post its enforcement. The amended Section 36 applies to pending Section 34 applications due to its procedural nature. Emphasizing the legislative intent to expedite arbitration and minimize court intervention, the court upheld the prospective application of the Amendment Act to ongoing proceedings&#039; procedural aspects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>