<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 806 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357103</link>
    <description>A Regional Rural Bank deemed to be a cooperative society under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 remained eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) because the deeming fiction and overriding effect of that special statute prevailed, and the section 80P(4) exclusion for cooperative banks did not apply where the bank was not shown to be a cooperative bank. The withdrawal of an earlier CBDT circular did not alter that statutory position. The Tribunal also held that an appellate authority could entertain a legal claim not raised in the original return or revised belatedly, particularly where the issue had already been examined, and the matter was remanded for fresh assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 806 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357103</link>
      <description>A Regional Rural Bank deemed to be a cooperative society under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 remained eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) because the deeming fiction and overriding effect of that special statute prevailed, and the section 80P(4) exclusion for cooperative banks did not apply where the bank was not shown to be a cooperative bank. The withdrawal of an earlier CBDT circular did not alter that statutory position. The Tribunal also held that an appellate authority could entertain a legal claim not raised in the original return or revised belatedly, particularly where the issue had already been examined, and the matter was remanded for fresh assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>