<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 786 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357083</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals. It upheld the deletion of the addition towards unexplained capital introduction by partners, reversed the addition towards unexplained unsecured loans, allowed deductions for the difference in CPWD and local rates, and deleted the addition on account of unexplained cash credits in the bank account. However, it upheld additions towards unexplained flat advances from customers and unexplained advance and expenditure. The Tribunal stressed the significance of proper documentation and evidence for substantiating claims under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 786 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357083</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals. It upheld the deletion of the addition towards unexplained capital introduction by partners, reversed the addition towards unexplained unsecured loans, allowed deductions for the difference in CPWD and local rates, and deleted the addition on account of unexplained cash credits in the bank account. However, it upheld additions towards unexplained flat advances from customers and unexplained advance and expenditure. The Tribunal stressed the significance of proper documentation and evidence for substantiating claims under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>