<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 34 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12300</link>
    <description>A generator set was held to fall within clause (xiii) of item (10A) of Appendix I to the Income-tax Rules, 1962 and to qualify for depreciation at 30%. The High Court applied noscitur a sociis and ejusdem generis, construing the entry as referring to two distinct categories: special devices including electric generators, and pumps running on wind energy. The qualifying words &quot;running on wind energy&quot; were held to attach only to pumps, not to electric generators. On that interpretation, the inclusive depreciation entry covered the generator set as a renewable energy device, and depreciation at the higher rate was available to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 34 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12300</link>
      <description>A generator set was held to fall within clause (xiii) of item (10A) of Appendix I to the Income-tax Rules, 1962 and to qualify for depreciation at 30%. The High Court applied noscitur a sociis and ejusdem generis, construing the entry as referring to two distinct categories: special devices including electric generators, and pumps running on wind energy. The qualifying words &quot;running on wind energy&quot; were held to attach only to pumps, not to electric generators. On that interpretation, the inclusive depreciation entry covered the generator set as a renewable energy device, and depreciation at the higher rate was available to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>