<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 773 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357070</link>
    <description>For the period before 1.4.2011, construction services used to build a warehouse were treated as eligible input services where the warehouse had a direct functional nexus with the output service of renting of immovable property. The relevant definition of input service was considered wide enough to cover services used for setting up the premises of the output service provider. On that basis, Cenvat credit on the construction services was admissible, and the related demand, interest and penalties were held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:00:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 773 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357070</link>
      <description>For the period before 1.4.2011, construction services used to build a warehouse were treated as eligible input services where the warehouse had a direct functional nexus with the output service of renting of immovable property. The relevant definition of input service was considered wide enough to cover services used for setting up the premises of the output service provider. On that basis, Cenvat credit on the construction services was admissible, and the related demand, interest and penalties were held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>